X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=ERNocwTgoX0Ud988NwSmGzHnNzFdk6KucBVySIW4YTM=;
	b=L5n+izUhznaBdzbstCkH7Af4GCturzMoYEqmRjuFn0+dN0Y7LS1HdiVxqhm7NjaiSz
	ULsy5cC/Lge2Oa90v/GYNw/M9I2nFNnuQDncyD7w/NBHxld+gDs2kCwROVhNrPQIqCR+
	E9zxvh2U/kIC0YBx68Xt27ITAlTM5AGPhbY3IyjGYCLn9MBM/IZ7jbJiPhEudLUdqiwx
	i2MXBt/S1LyZPjz9NsGcACng5LBWi9I2wcCr5BtW/ksAlieAaLodkegGuslwCpkbBVNg
	xtn0ocvm7tOCDcKoIQgBsnIzKB8wyEpj5QpVgvzfi0VYsqYw5iDsvTv1fj+57/wHqtJO
	TP9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
	:references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=ERNocwTgoX0Ud988NwSmGzHnNzFdk6KucBVySIW4YTM=;
	b=pQgJeosZKYPmlZugzPwWzjjOwxNpQ/3tKcF5j5pAPlGQM1H1kjq7+Aa3OWdNmHNuam
	dUttBvhH6/VpXGHlzISWVwsCuGo07F9WRPZz3znBEZUb1QKJnP0flRb5ofRVVuWQqquK
	kW1vXB/eqNCvEhc9yrM/d4t6gQBY1iyQV/Zw5haOpwRHCp8OlY4NQkap0cFLhUu9F9dB
	H4VrIWrzm1cSE28Za4zspI4/fysDEMKS2P2ZBsxDhYQz6wQ2lh018un7kjj5QNrVLTNc
	w2NNRS8lRSfHRco1OdLiCh8MP6HzgbrJvk0G7FGA048Tlo1XWZtnQK9vM6cbXXI2hZOH
	71fw==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AIkVDXIY12GkTOwJd+haGT5YhQQTKixAVLO6NKY6Ees8LHQJWKfFMKgLKLp8xNvy3ISE/g==
X-Received:	by 10.25.203.6 with SMTP id b6mr10524965lfg.145.1484592088167;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:41:28 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:41:26 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gaf: want an advice
Message-ID:	<20170116184126.GB24349@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<20170115211156 DOT GB27077 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAGde_xMmexzFqs59oKqB9btfKCQBFgji9mMDp4-6N7HHnzTzRQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAGde_xMmexzFqs59oKqB9btfKCQBFgji9mMDp4-6N7HHnzTzRQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 03:11:18PM +0100, Svenn Are Bjerkem (svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> On 15 January 2017 at 22:11, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com)
> [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> > Hi friends!
> >
> > Just to inform you: I'm still working on geda-gaf, my current work
> > is here:
> >
> >   https://github.com/vzh/geda-gaf/tree/unstable-1.9
> 
> nice, it puts itself nicely in parallel to the official geda-gaf
> checkout so I can follow both.

Well, I *could* do my work to be *the official geda-gaf*. Just don't
think it would be good for the project in the current state.

> 
> >
> > This work is basically refactoring of gnetlist. I've delayed other
> > branches to check if there is any sense to rewrite gnetlist in
> > Scheme. Well, I managed to rewrite it (with some simplifications)
> > in five weeks, though found the result doesn't suit me, because I
> > need much more testing. My code introduced many changes in test
> > files so I had to manually check any one, and still don't hope one
> > pair of eyes can grasp everything. This work has spent about three
> > months and is still far from being finished.
> 
> can we have real buses in gschem?
>

Not yet today, in the current state :-)
Though that's one of my goals: to make all objects (especially
buses) useful in all utilities, including GUI ones.

My goal is to elaborate structures and function prototypes, and
then write GUI for them.

-- 
  Vladimir

- Raw text -