X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ERNocwTgoX0Ud988NwSmGzHnNzFdk6KucBVySIW4YTM=; b=L5n+izUhznaBdzbstCkH7Af4GCturzMoYEqmRjuFn0+dN0Y7LS1HdiVxqhm7NjaiSz ULsy5cC/Lge2Oa90v/GYNw/M9I2nFNnuQDncyD7w/NBHxld+gDs2kCwROVhNrPQIqCR+ E9zxvh2U/kIC0YBx68Xt27ITAlTM5AGPhbY3IyjGYCLn9MBM/IZ7jbJiPhEudLUdqiwx i2MXBt/S1LyZPjz9NsGcACng5LBWi9I2wcCr5BtW/ksAlieAaLodkegGuslwCpkbBVNg xtn0ocvm7tOCDcKoIQgBsnIzKB8wyEpj5QpVgvzfi0VYsqYw5iDsvTv1fj+57/wHqtJO TP9A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ERNocwTgoX0Ud988NwSmGzHnNzFdk6KucBVySIW4YTM=; b=pQgJeosZKYPmlZugzPwWzjjOwxNpQ/3tKcF5j5pAPlGQM1H1kjq7+Aa3OWdNmHNuam dUttBvhH6/VpXGHlzISWVwsCuGo07F9WRPZz3znBEZUb1QKJnP0flRb5ofRVVuWQqquK kW1vXB/eqNCvEhc9yrM/d4t6gQBY1iyQV/Zw5haOpwRHCp8OlY4NQkap0cFLhUu9F9dB H4VrIWrzm1cSE28Za4zspI4/fysDEMKS2P2ZBsxDhYQz6wQ2lh018un7kjj5QNrVLTNc w2NNRS8lRSfHRco1OdLiCh8MP6HzgbrJvk0G7FGA048Tlo1XWZtnQK9vM6cbXXI2hZOH 71fw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIY12GkTOwJd+haGT5YhQQTKixAVLO6NKY6Ees8LHQJWKfFMKgLKLp8xNvy3ISE/g== X-Received: by 10.25.203.6 with SMTP id b6mr10524965lfg.145.1484592088167; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:41:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:41:26 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gaf: want an advice Message-ID: <20170116184126.GB24349@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user References: <20170115211156 DOT GB27077 AT localhost DOT localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 03:11:18PM +0100, Svenn Are Bjerkem (svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On 15 January 2017 at 22:11, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) > [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > Hi friends! > > > > Just to inform you: I'm still working on geda-gaf, my current work > > is here: > > > > https://github.com/vzh/geda-gaf/tree/unstable-1.9 > > nice, it puts itself nicely in parallel to the official geda-gaf > checkout so I can follow both. Well, I *could* do my work to be *the official geda-gaf*. Just don't think it would be good for the project in the current state. > > > > > This work is basically refactoring of gnetlist. I've delayed other > > branches to check if there is any sense to rewrite gnetlist in > > Scheme. Well, I managed to rewrite it (with some simplifications) > > in five weeks, though found the result doesn't suit me, because I > > need much more testing. My code introduced many changes in test > > files so I had to manually check any one, and still don't hope one > > pair of eyes can grasp everything. This work has spent about three > > months and is still far from being finished. > > can we have real buses in gschem? > Not yet today, in the current state :-) Though that's one of my goals: to make all objects (especially buses) useful in all utilities, including GUI ones. My goal is to elaborate structures and function prototypes, and then write GUI for them. -- Vladimir