X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From:	geda AT psjt DOT org (Stephan =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6ttcher?=)
To:	Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
Cc:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Parameter substitution
References:	<98D1C4E4-581D-4A03-94E4-E0330960EADF AT wellesley DOT edu>
	<s6na8h89ydi DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1607231941050 DOT 16188 AT nimbus>
Date:	Sat, 23 Jul 2016 20:27:03 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.11.1607231941050.16188@nimbus> (Roland Lutz's
	message of "Sat, 23 Jul 2016 19:41:45 +0200 (CEST)")
Message-ID:	<s6na8h843d4.fsf@blaulicht.dmz.brux>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u6NIRZIT019106
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> writes:

> On Sat, 23 Jul 2016, Stephan Böttcher wrote:
>> There is a patch I submitted a long time ago to gnetlist, implementing
>> functionality that I depend on, but that was never looked at by anybody.
>> This is very discouraging, when it comes to invest time for coding.
>
> Do you mean the patch for parameter substitution[1,2]?  I'd guess
> that, since that's quite a relevant change, the developers didn't want
> to just apply it without prior discussion.

A discussion that never happend. :-(

> I had a quick glance at the patch, and it seems what you have been
> doing is roughly equivalent to the parameter substitution patch I
> submitted a while ago in the experimental netlister feature branch[3].
> I just rebased that branch to the current HEAD and pushed it as
> "home/rlutz/experimental" to the geda-gaf repository, so you can use
> it right now by using that branch and setting
>
>   (set! use-new-frontend #t)
>
> in your gnetlistrc file.  The user-visible differences to your patch
> are that substitution values are defined with "subst=NAME=value" and
> referenced with "$(NAME)".
>
>> I am also discouraged by the requirement to use a lauchpad account,
>> which I don't have, and do not want to have.
>
> If it hadn't been for this requirement, I'd have reported gEDA bugs
> much earlier.  Maybe we should change that policy?
>
> Roland
>
>
> [1] http://www.ieap.uni-kiel.de/et/people/stephan/rpirena/gnetlist-parameters.patch
> [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/911440
> [3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cad.geda.user/47097/

-- 
Stephan

- Raw text -