X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com From: geda AT psjt DOT org (Stephan =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6ttcher?=) To: Roland Lutz Cc: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Parameter substitution References: <98D1C4E4-581D-4A03-94E4-E0330960EADF AT wellesley DOT edu> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 20:27:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Roland Lutz's message of "Sat, 23 Jul 2016 19:41:45 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u6NIRZIT019106 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Roland Lutz writes: > On Sat, 23 Jul 2016, Stephan Böttcher wrote: >> There is a patch I submitted a long time ago to gnetlist, implementing >> functionality that I depend on, but that was never looked at by anybody. >> This is very discouraging, when it comes to invest time for coding. > > Do you mean the patch for parameter substitution[1,2]? I'd guess > that, since that's quite a relevant change, the developers didn't want > to just apply it without prior discussion. A discussion that never happend. :-( > I had a quick glance at the patch, and it seems what you have been > doing is roughly equivalent to the parameter substitution patch I > submitted a while ago in the experimental netlister feature branch[3]. > I just rebased that branch to the current HEAD and pushed it as > "home/rlutz/experimental" to the geda-gaf repository, so you can use > it right now by using that branch and setting > > (set! use-new-frontend #t) > > in your gnetlistrc file. The user-visible differences to your patch > are that substitution values are defined with "subst=NAME=value" and > referenced with "$(NAME)". > >> I am also discouraged by the requirement to use a lauchpad account, >> which I don't have, and do not want to have. > > If it hadn't been for this requirement, I'd have reported gEDA bugs > much earlier. Maybe we should change that policy? > > Roland > > > [1] http://www.ieap.uni-kiel.de/et/people/stephan/rpirena/gnetlist-parameters.patch > [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/911440 > [3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cad.geda.user/47097/ -- Stephan