X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=CvbifWlp1M+9wqrStb56rPcdlkKM5NOlhbIf0Y7Le4c=;
	b=GzmqSJVRiwJDw8iUAv5rpFKIfvxtvZxe5I13rIUeMZLCI+CeaDXcpy0/PDGHy6G8dR
	s2x7af+XWQe6oMQQETPi+mPmxr337t63JqOLNzqULO/6YhkchntKNYGIByCVZjj98vZQ
	uBB2hdMd5Y75NaL1ZQgNLHi8BDIaq/RYcCfKHoOiSH6bZEOLmKaRe0knPhqXtgzbFUBV
	6OQG4w7ndS/TZjV8Ql/NFSSLdEJqPqxTefAFLfcqHhjXF5dj5l38q60bz1vFtukpSb7y
	vTmQRr4N+QeAA1/v0OAm0YRz3vhs7K0C50RuVaHU7/4xwjdBxatZ4MbEtmVrK/LHrg3g
	YWlg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.147.232 with SMTP id tn8mr6603291lbb.84.1443921292804;
	Sat, 03 Oct 2015 18:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<20151003222928.GC4287@localhost.localdomain>
References:	<560DB972 DOT 30203 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<201510012306 DOT t91N6MXc027775 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<560DCC35 DOT 9010505 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<201510020041 DOT t920fM6o031268 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<560DE183 DOT 4060305 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<5BF9C4DF-32C7-4C06-9F96-8F82C935254E AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<560EAEE1 DOT 6020701 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<3E72AC35-5862-41B9-A8FD-6804E89E9FFB AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<20151003210144 DOT GA21262 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<56104E16 DOT 3050006 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<20151003222928 DOT GC4287 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
Date:	Sun, 4 Oct 2015 01:14:52 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhSuaNy3PQ7CJJjTbzTM6TckNGRShobchRj42Vk10ixPGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA users mailing list <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com)
[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 11:52:22PM +0200, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> ...
>> My personal opinion is to bump it only if it's neccessary for some
>> substantial advantage. I wouldn't bump the version for the purpose of
>> bumping it.
>
> The one advantage I see is moving the project forward.
>
> In order to bump the version we have to throw out obsolete functions and
> replace them with new ones, which as a whole will ease transition to
> gtk3 in future.

A version bump to the end of gtk2 makes sense but gtk3 feels
premature. gtk3 has its detractors because of what happened with
GNOME3 and GIMP. gtk grew out of the need to make gimp and even the
gimp people seem to be having trouble with them now. I am not saying
dump gtk, just that this might not be the best use of our time right
now.

Igor2 is off working on something using SDL because it is maintained
but has a slower release cycle. The logical reason being that we don't
really care about new gtk functionality but we have to burn time
fixing things for each major gtk release.

> Cheers,
>   Vladimir



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -