X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=FIKS4u3RectnQxZwg9N6iJtLrXLAmBdesMyj0sf2gfk=;
	b=B73+G4yEMl9ABNCVQ48dOkLfVnx9K/I5jNxwAEdaWvjzI9PMXxQogN8ehykb6G91af
	vXT6wQ0uIUn2UPgDYoZPoidTBFOSRWEWHvuOaUPBb6VUzONaBvqTNR4z3YKU1ulmxdIK
	ejnSgtX+JDTx5+JAc3bd4fDQRXRUOPZFuEyvWlZM1Jsfleqa8uux80LtMYa7tV/b42al
	LWH3tXQVaJMgYvvvpfjpcpUkq16cIJKWI2oS7fQkxQYQ70dHzo/tQZLgc0Lk7jjh5HAW
	p9gdR60bIGMbI05vnMOGCya346DY1rOTsIxFb+AW2Rq28aqHwZTeHz2E2m4gsU3cuvzY
	HhkA==
X-Received:	by 10.152.43.229 with SMTP id z5mr693935lal.13.1442522153908;
	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 23:35:51 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-developers AT lists DOT launchpad DOT net, geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [Geda-developers] PLEASE STOP !!! - Re: [geda-user] Apollon
Message-ID:	<20150917203551.GB31987@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-developers AT lists DOT launchpad DOT net,
	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<CAM2RGhTbgUfGJZacRUQ=3VBAKtd0F7OV37oRZFVjHR4A9XecnA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150917043146 DOT GA1837 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509171124330 DOT 3828 AT nimbus>
	<20150917142035 DOT GA5896 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<201509171646 DOT t8HGkGZf019056 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<201509171646.t8HGkGZf019056@envy.delorie.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:46:16PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > 1. You haven't actually ask. You've stated 
> > ========================================================================
> > This introduces new dependencies on Python 2.7 and a C++ compiler.  For 
> > this reason, I didn't push it directly into master but into a new branch 
> > 'home/rlutz/xorn-integration'.  You can merge it into master if the new 
> > dependencies are ok.
> 
> Perhaps we're interpreting things different, but any time I see
> someone announce a branch, that's an invitation to discuss it.
> Billions of people don't comment on each branch, we have to rely on
> those who do (or the silence that follows) to direct us.  We can't
> guess what people think if they don't say something.
> 
> And given how much silence we've had in the past, I'm OK with being
> more lenient about letting patches in.  Worst case we can revert them
> later but at least we're providing a more receptive environment to new
> developers.
> 
> > 3. You appear to think developers are dead so you neither used the
> > developer list (OK, you had not been subscribed on it yet), nor
> > interested if there are any developers, nor filed a bug report on
> > Launchpad.
> 
> To be fair, I never do those either.

OK, thanks, now I see your point.

Cheers,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -