X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=FIKS4u3RectnQxZwg9N6iJtLrXLAmBdesMyj0sf2gfk=; b=B73+G4yEMl9ABNCVQ48dOkLfVnx9K/I5jNxwAEdaWvjzI9PMXxQogN8ehykb6G91af vXT6wQ0uIUn2UPgDYoZPoidTBFOSRWEWHvuOaUPBb6VUzONaBvqTNR4z3YKU1ulmxdIK ejnSgtX+JDTx5+JAc3bd4fDQRXRUOPZFuEyvWlZM1Jsfleqa8uux80LtMYa7tV/b42al LWH3tXQVaJMgYvvvpfjpcpUkq16cIJKWI2oS7fQkxQYQ70dHzo/tQZLgc0Lk7jjh5HAW p9gdR60bIGMbI05vnMOGCya346DY1rOTsIxFb+AW2Rq28aqHwZTeHz2E2m4gsU3cuvzY HhkA== X-Received: by 10.152.43.229 with SMTP id z5mr693935lal.13.1442522153908; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 23:35:51 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-developers AT lists DOT launchpad DOT net, geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [Geda-developers] PLEASE STOP !!! - Re: [geda-user] Apollon Message-ID: <20150917203551.GB31987@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-developers AT lists DOT launchpad DOT net, geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20150917043146 DOT GA1837 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150917142035 DOT GA5896 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <201509171646 DOT t8HGkGZf019056 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201509171646.t8HGkGZf019056@envy.delorie.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:46:16PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > 1. You haven't actually ask. You've stated > > ======================================================================== > > This introduces new dependencies on Python 2.7 and a C++ compiler. For > > this reason, I didn't push it directly into master but into a new branch > > 'home/rlutz/xorn-integration'. You can merge it into master if the new > > dependencies are ok. > > Perhaps we're interpreting things different, but any time I see > someone announce a branch, that's an invitation to discuss it. > Billions of people don't comment on each branch, we have to rely on > those who do (or the silence that follows) to direct us. We can't > guess what people think if they don't say something. > > And given how much silence we've had in the past, I'm OK with being > more lenient about letting patches in. Worst case we can revert them > later but at least we're providing a more receptive environment to new > developers. > > > 3. You appear to think developers are dead so you neither used the > > developer list (OK, you had not been subscribed on it yet), nor > > interested if there are any developers, nor filed a bug report on > > Launchpad. > > To be fair, I never do those either. OK, thanks, now I see your point. Cheers, Vladimir