www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2015/09/17/01:41:52

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <55FA527F.7060604@xs4all.nl>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 07:41:19 +0200
From: "Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110429 Fedora/2.0.14-1.fc13 SeaMonkey/2.0.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [Geda-developers] PLEASE STOP !!! - Re: [geda-user] Apollon
References: <CAM2RGhTbgUfGJZacRUQ=3VBAKtd0F7OV37oRZFVjHR4A9XecnA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <mtcrq3$lue$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To: <mtcrq3$lue$1@ger.gmane.org>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-
> user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>
>    
>> I understand that you have contributed meaningfully to this project but
>> we need a team to be blessed by the powers that be.
>>      
> In my very humble opinion, we need a working team in the first place. The
> keyword here is "working" as opposed to let patches bit rot, not decide
> weather or not a feature branch should get merged or abandoned, or not the
> least, procrastinate releases and have no road map with goals for future
> development whatsoever. Everything else should come second.
> (Sorry for the harsh words. But realistically, the above characterizes the
> progress of the geda project since about 2008 for the most part. Yes,
> there were significant improvements in some areas and I am glad about it.
> Else, I would have switched away since long. But seen from a distance the
> progress looks glacially -- in particular when compared to projects like
> freecad or kicad)
>
>
>    
>> The blessing legitimizes the team.
>>      
> Kings and popes need to be blessed...
>
>
>    
>> With out a legitimate team the project will devolve back into people
>> fighting on an email list
>>      
> Sorry, but I have not seen developers seriously fighting on geda-user ever
> since I started reading it in 2005/2006. The list geda-devel while it was
> readable for mortal users was even more peaceful.
>
>
>    
>> and even if code is written no release could ever be issued. gEDA will
>> be known as that project with a million forks,
>>      
> Being motivated and capable to contribute but locked out by the powers
> that be constitutes a strong motivation to fork. This is more than pure
> speculation. Remember, why Igor started his pcb-rnd?
>
> ---<)kaimartin(>---
>    
Hi Kai-Martin,

I invite you to join the pcb bug team on their quest to squash bugs 
during the monthly code sprint on Sunday September 27th.

I prepared a list of bugs we need to look into at:

https://blueprints.launchpad.net/pcb/+spec/triage

The gcode bugs you mentioned in another post are amongst them and have a 
prominent place in the list, to be triaged and worked upon.

<quote>

It is these bug reports:
   #1389527 GCode generator errors
   #1390439 GCode generator - wrong outline
   #1390442 GCode generator - missing mill/drillmill
   #1390450 GCode generator - drillmill is wrong
   #1390452 GCode generator - drill file is mirrored

---<)kaimartin(>---

</quote>

I await your input on these bugs and hope to meet you on #geda.

Kind regards,

Bert Timmerman.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019