X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=X4p2U04acchjuUG3NHgb9SgvAbWZZjiEBLZDhdC1/AI=;
	b=kI1eg6VuRanpqwNYT9HawlKNYAZdr85KuAuMWJEcAMgBOiac1vstZ6AKmyIasMLTPA
	7+BAAKNpzTPfMt1mw2puB6blx8blMrgkQbtpoC4L2+HNSddo81OXZTwrIqoeWOwwIjkc
	DeQjt5nujobyeo/RkaZ8zcs4KWgYk0XT11HcfbeLZL0hNMO881gBM5lDTmc/Z9KZZSVt
	y/nKAFIPNW2hPlCd0QqXj7eRCQ2qHWwcYGx0hiMDx7kXUjG5h8bLLllgoaUtqNj4pAly
	LTFzXATlQPu1yiyjR8lksq/829CoTHDZD/kx83fVjRoo36fhwqNROXKjAczrBmONNy5t
	7/jg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.50.142.37 with SMTP id rt5mr8312407igb.88.1441904836891;
	Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<mssbd6$i3i$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031356150 DOT 13201 AT nimbus>
	<55E8773B DOT 9000902 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031846370 DOT 7163 AT nimbus>
	<55E8831A DOT 8050307 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509032004020 DOT 10628 AT nimbus>
	<55E891FA DOT 2010509 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509032039300 DOT 14871 AT nimbus>
	<BC7E3E69-4914-4654-B020-1338C71E0CDB AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201509032030 DOT t83KU1Yq017045 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<55E97A3E DOT 2070402 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<69B8B3F4-A6E4-43E9-9055-C63A5D6A3707 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<msfjma$340$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509060518220 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<msidqe$66h$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<CAOuGh8-U2Eu3n-PZiCAd6R-aQD-N4s1Bd9-O2CJq7MjZBKkvHQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55F1890F DOT 4090705 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<55F18CCC DOT 7050404 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<mssbd6$i3i$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:07:16 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAOuGh8-L-2SY0F=-b-zaSyhy4WMopzdCkXh6vKBonoxxWcg0NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Desired changes
From:	"Bob Paddock (graceindustries AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Is the general idea of the patch solid? Or should it be dismissed because
> of some severe flaw?

Missing documentation was the major flaw at the time.

The comment about them being close to each other was never clear,
wasn't inclined to 'Read the Source Luke'.
May be related to can't over lap without controlled depth drilling:

"Bob,

Per our discussion, here are hypothetical examples of pricing:

4 layer board, no blind or buried vias, price = X.
4 layer board, single blind vias (layers 1-2 or 3-4), price = X + 1/2-2/3X.
4 layer boars, single buried vias (layers 2-3), price = X + X.
4 layer board, double blind vias (layers 1-2 and 3-4) price X + X + 1/2X
If blind vias overlap layers (say 1-3 and 3-4), we would have to no
bid at this time, as laser (controlled depth) drilling would be
required, and we do not have this process currently available."

- Raw text -