X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=JR6rhgYnwx4sZqaNwXMVh8o2KYCBSJ66an8R/CTNwwY=;
	b=XXAJ0UhGc7fymxDWdeU64xX53uFeYfouiXZkGCAhVjUb6YSeRGWnJwyQyo5iOT5LKQ
	0Xc0MO6hYOSCM2hPSVBHoCnM0mQO65GZl1dk/Go9UEhgTAMtfsr8747xBjsQQEaAq8Zk
	JzgHFrV4/qPW0NLKdmbaxi9L3i82YjsMjbrJ0otUN7uZsLo5Tyg8JOAWUe88Q7G59qoJ
	srUDvmOKO91bQ2/ABWiSJkj+mOcYBbMQVDE8Vcm49PH3BeV/rVdJi1QXvjre7jYmT3tA
	qB69vFSk95KhdpXKYUIVoBUPalOa1Mqsymo+SDOihFl6BqosOHLjy7Qf1WxpaBoNwSph
	G+xQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.206.108 with SMTP id ln12mr1787034lac.84.1440441331192;
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<55DAD3AC.9010202@iae.nl>
References:	<55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<CAM2RGhSZ1vi_DFKqZdZYxhto4ZaXLLscBt5m5kk+PH2ZoYW_vw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508230609370 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<55D9BB90 DOT 5020708 AT iae DOT nl>
	<201508231651 DOT t7NGpEVt030026 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<55DA2B4B DOT 1010104 AT iae DOT nl>
	<201508232023 DOT t7NKNlu9005137 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<55DA37CA DOT 7080108 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<55DA4135 DOT 6070107 AT iae DOT nl>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508240400270 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<55DAD3AC DOT 9010202 AT iae DOT nl>
Date:	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:35:30 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhS2sS8HqjUtT0=Y3vu1VKWh2AS4wtfp1FnnoGGQnNyGDg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Antifork
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:19 AM, myken <myken AT iae DOT nl> wrote:
>
>>> we need to encourage people to (1) do the "it's for me" work in
>>> trunk, and (2) feel empowered to work in trunk.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Exactly my intentions.
>>>
>>> +1 for me too, however I get the feeling we are getting back on the tread
>>> **developer excitement? was Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?**
>>> Which resulted in ... well ... uhhh ... nothing actually.
>>
>>
>> That thread was partly my inspiration to work on pcb-rnd again and try new
>> methods of demonstrating my results. At least, it did result in something
>> for me.
>
> Well you are right. No matter if someone agrees or disagrees with the route
> pcb-rnd has taken, it sure stirred things up. :-)

Yes that has been much needed agitation. My hope is that it provokes a
release of PCB.

-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -