X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=JR6rhgYnwx4sZqaNwXMVh8o2KYCBSJ66an8R/CTNwwY=; b=XXAJ0UhGc7fymxDWdeU64xX53uFeYfouiXZkGCAhVjUb6YSeRGWnJwyQyo5iOT5LKQ 0Xc0MO6hYOSCM2hPSVBHoCnM0mQO65GZl1dk/Go9UEhgTAMtfsr8747xBjsQQEaAq8Zk JzgHFrV4/qPW0NLKdmbaxi9L3i82YjsMjbrJ0otUN7uZsLo5Tyg8JOAWUe88Q7G59qoJ srUDvmOKO91bQ2/ABWiSJkj+mOcYBbMQVDE8Vcm49PH3BeV/rVdJi1QXvjre7jYmT3tA qB69vFSk95KhdpXKYUIVoBUPalOa1Mqsymo+SDOihFl6BqosOHLjy7Qf1WxpaBoNwSph G+xQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.206.108 with SMTP id ln12mr1787034lac.84.1440441331192; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:35:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55DAD3AC.9010202@iae.nl> References: <55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de> <55D9BB90 DOT 5020708 AT iae DOT nl> <201508231651 DOT t7NGpEVt030026 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55DA2B4B DOT 1010104 AT iae DOT nl> <201508232023 DOT t7NKNlu9005137 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55DA37CA DOT 7080108 AT jump-ing DOT de> <55DA4135 DOT 6070107 AT iae DOT nl> <55DAD3AC DOT 9010202 AT iae DOT nl> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:35:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Antifork From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:19 AM, myken wrote: > >>> we need to encourage people to (1) do the "it's for me" work in >>> trunk, and (2) feel empowered to work in trunk. >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Exactly my intentions. >>> >>> +1 for me too, however I get the feeling we are getting back on the tread >>> **developer excitement? was Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?** >>> Which resulted in ... well ... uhhh ... nothing actually. >> >> >> That thread was partly my inspiration to work on pcb-rnd again and try new >> methods of demonstrating my results. At least, it did result in something >> for me. > > Well you are right. No matter if someone agrees or disagrees with the route > pcb-rnd has taken, it sure stirred things up. :-) Yes that has been much needed agitation. My hope is that it provokes a release of PCB. -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/