X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-SourceIP:	95.97.163.245
X-Authenticated-Sender:	b DOT mykendevelopment AT upcmail DOT nl
Message-ID:	<55DAD3AC.9010202@iae.nl>
Date:	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:19:56 +0200
From:	myken <myken AT iae DOT nl>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Antifork
References:	<55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de> <CAM2RGhSZ1vi_DFKqZdZYxhto4ZaXLLscBt5m5kk+PH2ZoYW_vw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508230609370 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <55D9BB90 DOT 5020708 AT iae DOT nl> <201508231651 DOT t7NGpEVt030026 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55DA2B4B DOT 1010104 AT iae DOT nl> <201508232023 DOT t7NKNlu9005137 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55DA37CA DOT 7080108 AT jump-ing DOT de> <55DA4135 DOT 6070107 AT iae DOT nl> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508240400270 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1508240400270.6924@igor2priv>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

>> we need to encourage people to (1) do the "it's for me" work in
>> trunk, and (2) feel empowered to work in trunk.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Exactly my intentions.
>>
>> +1 for me too, however I get the feeling we are getting back on the 
>> tread
>> **developer excitement? was Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?**
>> Which resulted in ... well ... uhhh ... nothing actually.
>
> That thread was partly my inspiration to work on pcb-rnd again and try 
> new methods of demonstrating my results. At least, it did result in 
> something for me.
Well you are right. No matter if someone agrees or disagrees with the 
route pcb-rnd has taken, it sure stirred things up. :-)

- Raw text -