X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-SourceIP: 95.97.163.245 X-Authenticated-Sender: b DOT mykendevelopment AT upcmail DOT nl Message-ID: <55DAD3AC.9010202@iae.nl> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:19:56 +0200 From: myken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Antifork References: <55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de> <55D9BB90 DOT 5020708 AT iae DOT nl> <201508231651 DOT t7NGpEVt030026 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55DA2B4B DOT 1010104 AT iae DOT nl> <201508232023 DOT t7NKNlu9005137 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55DA37CA DOT 7080108 AT jump-ing DOT de> <55DA4135 DOT 6070107 AT iae DOT nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com >> we need to encourage people to (1) do the "it's for me" work in >> trunk, and (2) feel empowered to work in trunk. >> >> +1 >> >> Exactly my intentions. >> >> +1 for me too, however I get the feeling we are getting back on the >> tread >> **developer excitement? was Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?** >> Which resulted in ... well ... uhhh ... nothing actually. > > That thread was partly my inspiration to work on pcb-rnd again and try > new methods of demonstrating my results. At least, it did result in > something for me. Well you are right. No matter if someone agrees or disagrees with the route pcb-rnd has taken, it sure stirred things up. :-)