X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=lWp8n/nsl/C0qT0fHKG1HbNIG6Zgmvme1HY+2+SJ5Ds=;
	b=e3NZEa96X+kXyiKgD3npX4vHtF2SsUytMx4+O3hanSkEGsLTFAlkY5KbXyFub5ZWA8
	9mAnaHsUsK1nd2D4nJPeNoq3eRM//yVh9xpMxuq1awBhda/4gi2SBe0M4+zwp7ggy5M1
	qPywJLohVzhrpFljT/3z1BossRZBx2CIO0nj7G6MJe7P9Ry30sE+/G0CvW+MQlUkEFOh
	BcP2XqSp4E0cKbQe3u6RTkR96hBGJBVHK9yYdiqganZ1JL0nyNq/y8gaAqMduXyrn1Kn
	nz7pCQBJNtTZu4DfN3HJFLqV39wQm2PGR5Ea5pBAihhoa5fxq2GviTBbp30SdS6qCkC2
	26Xw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.21.37 with SMTP id s5mr33783734lae.2.1438110283639; Tue,
	28 Jul 2015 12:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<201507281639.t6SGdKZn002381@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<55B7AEFD DOT 9060307 AT iae DOT nl>
	<201507281639 DOT t6SGdKZn002381 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:04:43 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhTj4yPEpcarCM6UZVxZNGdEafGF6296GBgCiwpfBwjXfg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] What is the current version of PCB
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:39 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> To my knowledge PCB uses the yyyymmdd format as the version numbering,
>> how does that relate to version 2.0?
>
> That file is ancient.  Probably dates back to when we (Harry) thought
> there would be a 2.0 ;-)

I really wish geda had not changed version naming schemes as often as it did.

-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -