X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=lWp8n/nsl/C0qT0fHKG1HbNIG6Zgmvme1HY+2+SJ5Ds=; b=e3NZEa96X+kXyiKgD3npX4vHtF2SsUytMx4+O3hanSkEGsLTFAlkY5KbXyFub5ZWA8 9mAnaHsUsK1nd2D4nJPeNoq3eRM//yVh9xpMxuq1awBhda/4gi2SBe0M4+zwp7ggy5M1 qPywJLohVzhrpFljT/3z1BossRZBx2CIO0nj7G6MJe7P9Ry30sE+/G0CvW+MQlUkEFOh BcP2XqSp4E0cKbQe3u6RTkR96hBGJBVHK9yYdiqganZ1JL0nyNq/y8gaAqMduXyrn1Kn nz7pCQBJNtTZu4DfN3HJFLqV39wQm2PGR5Ea5pBAihhoa5fxq2GviTBbp30SdS6qCkC2 26Xw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.21.37 with SMTP id s5mr33783734lae.2.1438110283639; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:04:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201507281639.t6SGdKZn002381@envy.delorie.com> References: <55B7AEFD DOT 9060307 AT iae DOT nl> <201507281639 DOT t6SGdKZn002381 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:04:43 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] What is the current version of PCB From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:39 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> To my knowledge PCB uses the yyyymmdd format as the version numbering, >> how does that relate to version 2.0? > > That file is ancient. Probably dates back to when we (Harry) thought > there would be a 2.0 ;-) I really wish geda had not changed version naming schemes as often as it did. -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/