X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<1435666431.676.13.camel@ssalewski.de>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From:	Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:13:51 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<20150630083528.GY19654@fi.muni.cz>
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1506281932040 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <1435581145 DOT 1447 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<CAOFvGD7npho6fPKAEmce6L1nXy=5EEsVaEH-Vj_XEuiLddodDA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150630083528 DOT GY19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
X-Mailer:	Evolution 3.12.11
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 10:35 +0200, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
> it would be nice if I could just draw the schematics, choose
> footprints for it, route the PCB, and send the Gerber files to the
> fab.

Sure. I think that is the main reason that so many people (at least here
in Germany) are using Eagle. Eagle is not very powerful, not very easy
to use or beautiful, but has a large collection of trustful symbols and
footprint.

For FOSS EDA situation is not that good. Some people may create some
symbols or footprints and maybe make them public available, but do not
care much about systematically naming or quality. There are a few
exceptions of course, Mr Luciano (name may be misspelled) tried to
create high quality PCB footprints, and some people at gedasymbols tried
it also. I am not sure if situation is really better for KiCAD. And
converters from commercial products like Eagle? I do not think that is
really legal and that commercial companies will like that.

- Raw text -