X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <1435666431.676.13.camel@ssalewski.de> Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? From: Stefan Salewski To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:13:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20150630083528.GY19654@fi.muni.cz> References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <1435581145 DOT 1447 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150630083528 DOT GY19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 10:35 +0200, Jan Kasprzak wrote: > it would be nice if I could just draw the schematics, choose > footprints for it, route the PCB, and send the Gerber files to the > fab. Sure. I think that is the main reason that so many people (at least here in Germany) are using Eagle. Eagle is not very powerful, not very easy to use or beautiful, but has a large collection of trustful symbols and footprint. For FOSS EDA situation is not that good. Some people may create some symbols or footprints and maybe make them public available, but do not care much about systematically naming or quality. There are a few exceptions of course, Mr Luciano (name may be misspelled) tried to create high quality PCB footprints, and some people at gedasymbols tried it also. I am not sure if situation is really better for KiCAD. And converters from commercial products like Eagle? I do not think that is really legal and that commercial companies will like that.