X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date:	Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:40:02 -0400
Message-Id:	<201506291540.t5TFe2LC030729@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<20150629113018.GH19654@fi.muni.cz> (message from Jan Kasprzak on
	Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:30:18 +0200)
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1506281932040 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> It would be helpful to be able to denote attributes of the endpoints
> of nets,
>
> The barrier for using and enhancing the gedasymbols.org library
> should be lowered

You have asked for two hard things.  We have very few active
developers.  So, if you want the hard things done, you'll need to
convince someone to do them, or do them yourself. TANSTAAFL.

As for the gedasymbols CVS issue, CVS solves two problems: it is easy
to manage, and it prevents abuse.  Adding accounts is trivial for me
to do, anonymous netizens can't upload unrelated (possibly illegal
and/or dangerous) content, and every file is associated with a legal
owner (for copyright purposes).

And before you say "XYZ can do those things" remember that someone has
to *make* XYZ do those things.  That someone is not going to be me.
If someone else wants to take gedasymbols to the "next level", that
someone will have to step up to the task.

- Raw text -