www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=gamma; | |
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer | |
:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; | |
bh=Ai5G7IFm7ZkGebupLIdh4wl5yozPimdrJNDBQWWXqoQ=; | |
b=Br8C0meQ23MWNVBL1pV9wAy4g5QHVOeNw+7pr/aqNpQdvS72pg9flwf0WLzRTZHmWs | |
TL0beLF6dNKSC6b7JFfSvjjv0OqLySHnq7DTX+hdZecO6hkdHdZ/oOE10SLH0BNra/BR | |
1Fx4+cvcDtt8hU/VSTNBo0ockpzuReKzHaxDo= | |
Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:28:53 -0500 |
From: | Vanessa Ezekowitz <vanessaezekowitz AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Modern GAL/PAL design with gEDA? |
Message-ID: | <20111129102853.481f659f@rainbird> |
In-Reply-To: | <Prayer.1.3.4.1111291310370.19507@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> |
References: | <20111117204524 DOT 10e586f5 AT rainbird> |
<4EC5CBEE DOT 5060904 AT optonline DOT net> | |
<CAN0Jx-84K3n+g+ZH29wjzkuusBa=Bk_F=SaY+Z=fdm-JTf=HKQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<20111120162218 DOT 555bc069 AT rainbird> | |
<4ECA9BF9 DOT 9000601 AT ecosensory DOT com> | |
<20111128150702 DOT 2c75a231 AT rainbird> | |
<Prayer DOT 1 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 1111291310370 DOT 19507 AT hermes-2 DOT csi DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> | |
X-Mailer: | Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id pATFRPiX026440 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On 29 Nov 2011 13:10:37 +0000 "Peter C.J. Clifton" <pcjc2 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> wrote: > On Nov 28 2011, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote: > > > As an aside: whoever wrote ispLEVER's error messages needed a lesson in > > user friendliness. :-) > > Speaking of ispLEVER.. have you EVER encountered a more awkward, difficult > to use package? Try their schematic editor - seriously! The Classic edition seems pretty straightforward, at least for the simplistic stuff I'm doing. As for schematics.... I think I'll stick to gschem. :-) -- "There are some things in life worth obsessing over. Most things aren't, and when you learn that, life improves." http://digitalaudioconcepts.com Vanessa Ezekowitz <vanessaezekowitz AT gmail DOT com>
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |