X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=Ai5G7IFm7ZkGebupLIdh4wl5yozPimdrJNDBQWWXqoQ=;
        b=Br8C0meQ23MWNVBL1pV9wAy4g5QHVOeNw+7pr/aqNpQdvS72pg9flwf0WLzRTZHmWs
         TL0beLF6dNKSC6b7JFfSvjjv0OqLySHnq7DTX+hdZecO6hkdHdZ/oOE10SLH0BNra/BR
         1Fx4+cvcDtt8hU/VSTNBo0ockpzuReKzHaxDo=
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:28:53 -0500
From: Vanessa Ezekowitz <vanessaezekowitz AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Modern GAL/PAL design with gEDA?
Message-ID: <20111129102853.481f659f@rainbird>
In-Reply-To: <Prayer.1.3.4.1111291310370.19507@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20111117204524 DOT 10e586f5 AT rainbird>
	<4EC5CBEE DOT 5060904 AT optonline DOT net>
	<CAN0Jx-84K3n+g+ZH29wjzkuusBa=Bk_F=SaY+Z=fdm-JTf=HKQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20111120162218 DOT 555bc069 AT rainbird>
	<4ECA9BF9 DOT 9000601 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<20111128150702 DOT 2c75a231 AT rainbird>
	<Prayer DOT 1 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 1111291310370 DOT 19507 AT hermes-2 DOT csi DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id pATFRPiX026440
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 29 Nov 2011 13:10:37 +0000
"Peter C.J. Clifton" <pcjc2 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> wrote:

> On Nov 28 2011, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote:
> 
> > As an aside: whoever wrote ispLEVER's error messages needed a lesson in 
> > user friendliness. :-)
> 
> Speaking of ispLEVER.. have you EVER encountered a more awkward, difficult 
> to use package? Try their schematic editor - seriously!

The Classic edition seems pretty straightforward, at least for the simplistic stuff I'm doing.  As for schematics.... I think I'll stick to gschem. :-)

-- 
"There are some things in life worth obsessing over.  Most
things aren't, and when you learn that, life improves."
http://digitalaudioconcepts.com
Vanessa Ezekowitz <vanessaezekowitz AT gmail DOT com>