www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Sat, 12 Nov 2011 21:51:27 +0100 |
From: | Kai-Martin <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] duplicate refdes values |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Cc: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
In-Reply-To: | <20111108190803.GE6940@yumi> (from metan.lists@gmail.com on Tue |
Nov 8 20:08:03 2011) | |
X-Mailer: | Balsa 2.4.10 |
Message-Id: | <1321131090.16944.4@kwak> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Spam_score: | -2.9 |
X-Spam_bar: | -- |
X-Provags-ID: | V02:K0:sXo32kCH/sX5T6iwNjlNTGR4cfUlE/t344McSWi0u11 |
599e+ELLbwX32inKmYlGRhMIz0UAjxIYAXVVzAYidfncB98LJ1 | |
MC4Kvp7MlnnI6CZrNYBQMGqmotJeIOnZ8DYt3MpXExJf0dTxyl | |
L0pwl8Gupj2ZkSalOEJKjjcURJAnrDQ2k9BocCUoBs8Py68SYp | |
AXW9xqo76AKgdIJLFMUZZltSUD+rI3pv1aqd7UQ+kUmEoQSaM0 | |
sGabX+KYBLa7/jDrJD0IvXVMSgMCcjX9wEnO0ZZFpmeg+5PcAQ | |
EKdkIBcTlSahNXxpRdyV//zWMUn | |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--=-CVy2nHgUBiokD3OwkJPy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/08/2011 08:08:03 PM, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > So you have three syms for one component and one footprint. Do the pins > of the syms overlap or not? My most common case is a dual opamp. This is represented by three entities in the schematics -- Two triangles for the two amplifier slots, and a rectangle for the power pins. >=20 > > The tricky part is being *reliable* about detecting overlapping > > refdes's vs an intentionally split-up component. You have to consider > > all the possible situations and plan accordingly. If most situations can be handled correctly automatically but a few rare corner cases remain, a way to suppress warnings might be the way to go. For this purpose a special attribute "dont-warn" might be handy. If set to "dont-warn=3Dduplicate-refdes" gnetlist would know, that the duplicate refdes is deliberate in this special case. ---<)kaimartin(>--- --=20 Kai-Martin Knaak Email: kmk AT familieknaak DOT de =D6ffentlicher PGP-Schl=FCssel: http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=3D0x6C0B9F53= --=-CVy2nHgUBiokD3OwkJPy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk6+3FIACgkQt9RkiGwLn1PWzACgss6oMNTjdtH82xEUDnqFXHT4 iCYAn2d+o3fLJtWNbT1RAwA1bVZXQIIq =U1X5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-CVy2nHgUBiokD3OwkJPy--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |