X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 21:51:27 +0100
From: Kai-Martin <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] duplicate refdes values
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Cc: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20111108190803.GE6940@yumi> (from metan.lists@gmail.com on Tue
	Nov  8 20:08:03 2011)
X-Mailer: Balsa 2.4.10
Message-Id: <1321131090.16944.4@kwak>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="=-CVy2nHgUBiokD3OwkJPy"
X-Spam_score: -2.9
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:sXo32kCH/sX5T6iwNjlNTGR4cfUlE/t344McSWi0u11
 599e+ELLbwX32inKmYlGRhMIz0UAjxIYAXVVzAYidfncB98LJ1
 MC4Kvp7MlnnI6CZrNYBQMGqmotJeIOnZ8DYt3MpXExJf0dTxyl
 L0pwl8Gupj2ZkSalOEJKjjcURJAnrDQ2k9BocCUoBs8Py68SYp
 AXW9xqo76AKgdIJLFMUZZltSUD+rI3pv1aqd7UQ+kUmEoQSaM0
 sGabX+KYBLa7/jDrJD0IvXVMSgMCcjX9wEnO0ZZFpmeg+5PcAQ
 EKdkIBcTlSahNXxpRdyV//zWMUn
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--=-CVy2nHgUBiokD3OwkJPy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 11/08/2011 08:08:03 PM, Cyril Hrubis wrote:

> So you have three syms for one component and one footprint. Do the pins
> of the syms overlap or not?

My most common case is a dual opamp. This is represented by three entities
in the schematics -- Two triangles for the two amplifier slots, and a
rectangle for the power pins.

>=20
> > The tricky part is being *reliable* about detecting overlapping
> > refdes's vs an intentionally split-up component.  You have to consider
> > all the possible situations and plan accordingly.

If most situations can be handled correctly automatically but a few
rare corner cases remain, a way to suppress warnings might be the way
to go. For this purpose a special attribute "dont-warn" might be handy.
If set to "dont-warn=3Dduplicate-refdes" gnetlist would know, that the
duplicate refdes is deliberate in this special case.

---<)kaimartin(>---
--=20
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: kmk AT familieknaak DOT de
=D6ffentlicher PGP-Schl=FCssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=3D0x6C0B9F53=

--=-CVy2nHgUBiokD3OwkJPy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk6+3FIACgkQt9RkiGwLn1PWzACgss6oMNTjdtH82xEUDnqFXHT4
iCYAn2d+o3fLJtWNbT1RAwA1bVZXQIIq
=U1X5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-CVy2nHgUBiokD3OwkJPy--