X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	ham01.websitewelcome.com
X-Spam-Flag2999:	NO
X-Spam-Level2999:
X-Spam-Status2999:	"No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gibibit.com;
	h=Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-BWhitelist:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir:X-Source-Sender:X-Source-Auth:X-Email-Count:X-Source-Cap;
	b=gqlVHyqyig83IXzkT5fWQc5t8hec2pZmInP15xkSopUGy2vwfDVvU6vuljcTKNRv7W1uH19GCiQmtdcuTCaD3L8o+36IlInuU/R5brIuSpArP2k0LlvC1XK2/nx0Ps5u;
Date:	Tue, 8 Nov 2011 11:36:56 -0800
From:	Colin D Bennett <colin AT gibibit DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] duplicate refdes values
Message-ID:	<20111108113656.7c9da9e6@svelte>
In-Reply-To:	<201111081833.pA8IXpek012142@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<20111108100616 DOT GA32119 AT yumi>
	<89AF1CB2-6703-4ABC-A43D-7EA37559426F AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20111108180039 DOT GA6472 AT yumi>
	<201111081833 DOT pA8IXpek012142 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-AntiAbuse:	This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse:	Primary Hostname - gator297.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Original Domain - delorie.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse:	Sender Address Domain - gibibit.com
X-BWhitelist:	no
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender:	spk.venturedesignservices.com (svelte) [65.61.115.34]:29002
X-Source-Auth:	colin AT gibibit DOT com
X-Email-Count:	1
X-Source-Cap:	c2t5bGVuO3NreWxlbjtnYXRvcjI5Ny5ob3N0Z2F0b3IuY29t
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:33:51 -0500
DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> The tricky part is being *reliable* about detecting overlapping
> refdes's vs an intentionally split-up component.  You have to
> consider all the possible situations and plan accordingly.

The drc2 gnetlist back end only warns on duplicate *pins*, not
duplicate refdes's: that is how IC split power/ground symbols work.
And it must exclude slotted components as well.

Regards,
Colin

- Raw text -