X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on ham01.websitewelcome.com X-Spam-Flag2999: NO X-Spam-Level2999: X-Spam-Status2999: "No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gibibit.com; h=Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-BWhitelist:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir:X-Source-Sender:X-Source-Auth:X-Email-Count:X-Source-Cap; b=gqlVHyqyig83IXzkT5fWQc5t8hec2pZmInP15xkSopUGy2vwfDVvU6vuljcTKNRv7W1uH19GCiQmtdcuTCaD3L8o+36IlInuU/R5brIuSpArP2k0LlvC1XK2/nx0Ps5u; Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 11:36:56 -0800 From: Colin D Bennett To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] duplicate refdes values Message-ID: <20111108113656.7c9da9e6@svelte> In-Reply-To: <201111081833.pA8IXpek012142@envy.delorie.com> References: <20111108100616 DOT GA32119 AT yumi> <89AF1CB2-6703-4ABC-A43D-7EA37559426F AT noqsi DOT com> <20111108180039 DOT GA6472 AT yumi> <201111081833 DOT pA8IXpek012142 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator297.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - delorie.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gibibit.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: spk.venturedesignservices.com (svelte) [65.61.115.34]:29002 X-Source-Auth: colin AT gibibit DOT com X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: c2t5bGVuO3NreWxlbjtnYXRvcjI5Ny5ob3N0Z2F0b3IuY29t Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:33:51 -0500 DJ Delorie wrote: > The tricky part is being *reliable* about detecting overlapping > refdes's vs an intentionally split-up component. You have to > consider all the possible situations and plan accordingly. The drc2 gnetlist back end only warns on duplicate *pins*, not duplicate refdes's: that is how IC split power/ground symbols work. And it must exclude slotted components as well. Regards, Colin