X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=G4xHAvLNeAokPdrzq9vjBVqVbF2XNRUnYN9D5pBB1cQ=;
	b=VzVtz95z9yMw8hdpB4Ds2EORrDuamyoOFSEdeGinbqhUVR0sD4yQ1+zBYkWo+EwMbI
	0ZfOMVhMVb9KawBTBhFWbY7Wq0p1+Vtmn+tysAQ/trDFFM7P4NyunLyZk4hW2bFkBiGw
	BwJSkjeykECZSRkltLe4EXKpT4p4l/MFYMS3Q=
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=CZoohDS6bXVEv5Y6QIExz3XWxOrlkfRUA+j9L6w0mWJBBmxhX3cmATOHAUk3LcHda0
	3AGjMobwXUHwc6aLu9+M66OdB3Fo1YQkVwc+eZ1pQjNNfXiMp1FyCAeJ9ACycXw3vmmx
	QK6Egx/RFO88RiZUZiS301R2GvXf0ncFFy0+k=
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<c803f64c-6121-4b52-a2f0-b8a168f2d0d4@n8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
References:	<c803f64c-6121-4b52-a2f0-b8a168f2d0d4 AT n8g2000vbb DOT googlegroups DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 13 May 2009 23:40:46 -0700
Message-ID:	<7705c9030905132340u49a2fd15ke564b9ce930c09db@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Python, Perl, Lua, Ruby -- anybody??
From:	Blair Campbell <blairdude AT gmail DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

I recently compiled perl 5.10.0 with DJ-ELF and it sometimes comes in
handy to have perl with some modules for configure scripts.

On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> I've noticed that Python 2.4.2, Perl 5.8.8, Ruby 1.8.4, and various
> Lua versions (and forks!) work on DOS via DJGPP. My main question is
> this: =A0does anybody here regularly use them, either in pure DOS with
> the DJGPP version or on other OSes (GNU/Linux, Win32, Mac OS X)?? And
> if so, have you ever rebuilt any of them yourselves or do you just use
> stock versions? And even more specifically, what do you use them for?
> (But I'm not getting my hopes up since nobody responded to "make
> alternatives" thread....)
>

- Raw text -