X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=G4xHAvLNeAokPdrzq9vjBVqVbF2XNRUnYN9D5pBB1cQ=; b=VzVtz95z9yMw8hdpB4Ds2EORrDuamyoOFSEdeGinbqhUVR0sD4yQ1+zBYkWo+EwMbI 0ZfOMVhMVb9KawBTBhFWbY7Wq0p1+Vtmn+tysAQ/trDFFM7P4NyunLyZk4hW2bFkBiGw BwJSkjeykECZSRkltLe4EXKpT4p4l/MFYMS3Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CZoohDS6bXVEv5Y6QIExz3XWxOrlkfRUA+j9L6w0mWJBBmxhX3cmATOHAUk3LcHda0 3AGjMobwXUHwc6aLu9+M66OdB3Fo1YQkVwc+eZ1pQjNNfXiMp1FyCAeJ9ACycXw3vmmx QK6Egx/RFO88RiZUZiS301R2GvXf0ncFFy0+k= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 23:40:46 -0700 Message-ID: <7705c9030905132340u49a2fd15ke564b9ce930c09db@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Python, Perl, Lua, Ruby -- anybody?? From: Blair Campbell To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk I recently compiled perl 5.10.0 with DJ-ELF and it sometimes comes in handy to have perl with some modules for configure scripts. On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Rugxulo wrote: > I've noticed that Python 2.4.2, Perl 5.8.8, Ruby 1.8.4, and various > Lua versions (and forks!) work on DOS via DJGPP. My main question is > this: =A0does anybody here regularly use them, either in pure DOS with > the DJGPP version or on other OSes (GNU/Linux, Win32, Mac OS X)?? And > if so, have you ever rebuilt any of them yourselves or do you just use > stock versions? And even more specifically, what do you use them for? > (But I'm not getting my hopes up since nobody responded to "make > alternatives" thread....) >