www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Tue, 18 Apr 2000 11:08:32 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Odp: CWSDPMI r5 |
In-Reply-To: | <38FB410C.26753.D0CA35@localhost> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000418110804.28255B-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote: > In FAQ (14.2): > (For PGCC and GCC version 2.95 and later, use -O6 instead of -O2.) > > For all versions of gcc (including gcc-2.95.2) optimization levels higher > than -O3 is taken as -O3, only for PGCC -O4, -O5,... have some > meaning) Thanks for the corrections. Does GCC 2.96 (the development version) change this in any way? What about the Haifa scheduler--does it change the meaning of -O* switches?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |