Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 11:08:32 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Odp: CWSDPMI r5
In-Reply-To: <38FB410C.26753.D0CA35@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000418110804.28255B-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:

> In FAQ (14.2):   
> (For PGCC and GCC version 2.95 and later, use -O6 instead of -O2.)
> 
> For all versions of gcc (including gcc-2.95.2) optimization levels higher 
> than -O3 is taken as -O3, only for PGCC -O4, -O5,... have some 
> meaning)

Thanks for the corrections.

Does GCC 2.96 (the development version) change this in any way?  What
about the Haifa scheduler--does it change the meaning of -O* switches?