From:	Felix Natter <f DOT natter AT ndh DOT net>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: libg++ vs. libstdc++
Date:	28 Nov 1999 21:24:46 +0100
Organization:	Customer of NDH Netzwerkdienste Hoeger GmbH
Lines:	18
Message-ID:	<m3bt8e9xf5.fsf@mybaby.home.felix>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 991128112305 DOT 6867F-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	port135.bonn.ndh.net
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	passat.ndh.net 943820681 22813 195.94.93.135 (28 Nov 1999 20:24:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT ndh DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date:	28 Nov 1999 20:24:41 GMT
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.070098 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) Emacs/20.4
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> Because it isn't maintained anymore.
I suggest to put a note in the ZIP-picker and elsewhere,
as there has been before
there isn't even a note in the archive (lgpp*) (!)

> libg++ is a library of GNU-specific C++ classes.  It is not maintained
> anymore, and so you should stop using it and rewrite your code to use
> equivalent classes from libstdc++.
I know there aren't any ANSI C++-replacements for Rational, Regex etc.

How about String ? - the ANSI C++-string class (#include <string>)
seems to be much more primitive (It isn't able to convert int, floats etc.)

Are there any replacements for these being developed (except for string) ?

-- 
Felix Natter

- Raw text -