From: Felix Natter <f DOT natter AT ndh DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: libg++ vs. libstdc++
Date: 28 Nov 1999 21:24:46 +0100
Organization: Customer of NDH Netzwerkdienste Hoeger GmbH
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <m3bt8e9xf5.fsf@mybaby.home.felix>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 991128112305 DOT 6867F-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: port135.bonn.ndh.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: passat.ndh.net 943820681 22813 195.94.93.135 (28 Nov 1999 20:24:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT ndh DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Nov 1999 20:24:41 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070098 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) Emacs/20.4
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


> Because it isn't maintained anymore.
I suggest to put a note in the ZIP-picker and elsewhere,
as there has been before
there isn't even a note in the archive (lgpp*) (!)

> libg++ is a library of GNU-specific C++ classes.  It is not maintained
> anymore, and so you should stop using it and rewrite your code to use
> equivalent classes from libstdc++.
I know there aren't any ANSI C++-replacements for Rational, Regex etc.

How about String ? - the ANSI C++-string class (#include <string>)
seems to be much more primitive (It isn't able to convert int, floats etc.)

Are there any replacements for these being developed (except for string) ?

-- 
Felix Natter