From:	Rez <rividh DOT minusthispart AT earthlink DOT net>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: allegro gone missing?
Date:	Mon, 11 Oct 1999 17:38:02 -0700
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 991011122627 DOT 28307G-100000 AT is>
X-Posted-Path-Was:	not-for-mail
X-ELN-Date:	12 Oct 1999 00:35:17 GMT
X-ELN-Insert-Date:	Mon Oct 11 17:45:01 1999
Organization:	Offworld Press
Lines:	22
Mime-Version:	1.0
NNTP-Posting-Host:	1cust247.tnt2.lancaster.ca.da.uu.net
Message-ID:	<380282EA.3E6A@earthlink.net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 3.04 (Win16; I)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Michael Abbott aka frEk wrote:
> 
> > > CWSDPMI. It's free. Get it at the Zip Picker.
> >
> > I don't know about everyone else but for speed I usually use Win '95s
> > DPMI...
> 
>Are you saying that Windows' DPMI server is faster than CWSDPMI?  Or are
> you saying that it is smaller.  I find it hard to believe how could
> someone make such claims.

I don't know about Windows' DPMI, but I did some performance testing of
CSWDPMI vs DRDOS7.03's DPMI. BOOM (DOOM clone) ran at the same speed +/-
less than 0.1% difference (however it takes quite a bit longer to get
thrashy on DRDOS's DPMI). OTOH, BSPv3.0 ran at 10% faster on DRDOS's
DPMI. This was reproducible and consistent.

Eli: got your long mail, I'm just behind. 

~REZ~

- Raw text -