From: Rez <rividh DOT minusthispart AT earthlink DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: allegro gone missing?
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 17:38:02 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 991011122627 DOT 28307G-100000 AT is>
X-Posted-Path-Was: not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-ELN-Date: 12 Oct 1999 00:35:17 GMT
X-ELN-Insert-Date: Mon Oct 11 17:45:01 1999
Organization: Offworld Press
Lines: 22
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 1cust247.tnt2.lancaster.ca.da.uu.net
Message-ID: <380282EA.3E6A@earthlink.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04 (Win16; I)
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Michael Abbott aka frEk wrote:
> 
> > > CWSDPMI. It's free. Get it at the Zip Picker.
> >
> > I don't know about everyone else but for speed I usually use Win '95s
> > DPMI...
> 
>Are you saying that Windows' DPMI server is faster than CWSDPMI?  Or are
> you saying that it is smaller.  I find it hard to believe how could
> someone make such claims.

I don't know about Windows' DPMI, but I did some performance testing of
CSWDPMI vs DRDOS7.03's DPMI. BOOM (DOOM clone) ran at the same speed +/-
less than 0.1% difference (however it takes quite a bit longer to get
thrashy on DRDOS's DPMI). OTOH, BSPv3.0 ran at 10% faster on DRDOS's
DPMI. This was reproducible and consistent.

Eli: got your long mail, I'm just behind. 

~REZ~