From:	"Damian Yerrick" <web DOT poison AT pineight DOT 8m DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: RHIDE/DJGPP C++
Date:	Sun, 10 Oct 1999 13:21:48 -0500
Organization:	Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Lines:	27
Message-ID:	<7tqlje$n78$1@solomon.cs.rose-hulman.edu>
References:	<3800951B DOT 7497E57B AT connection DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	yerricde.laptop.rose-hulman.edu
X-Trace:	solomon.cs.rose-hulman.edu 939579822 23784 137.112.205.146 (10 Oct 1999 18:23:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	news AT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Date:	10 Oct 1999 18:23:42 GMT
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MIMEOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

sam <samirw AT connection DOT com> wrote:
> Is it still O.K. to use rhide for c++? I see that
> RHIDE has not changed in several years.
>8
> It calls LD with the -lstdcx and of course this
> causes 'lib not found' or similar message.

Here's what you do to fix the -lstdcx bug:

1. Look in Read Me Third.
http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~yerricde/minifaq.txt
2. If that doesn't help, look in section 8.7 of the
DJGPP FAQ list.
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/v2faq/

> I have just gone through the process of downloading all the files
> suggested by the picker but still no STDCX.a

It used to be called LIBSTDCX.A (to conform with old DOS
8.3 naming); now it's called libstdcxx.a (note the extra x). Some
versions of RHIDE were not updated to reflect the change.


Damian Yerrrick
http://come.to/yerrick

- Raw text -