From: "Damian Yerrick" <web DOT poison AT pineight DOT 8m DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: RHIDE/DJGPP C++
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 13:21:48 -0500
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <7tqlje$n78$1@solomon.cs.rose-hulman.edu>
References: <3800951B DOT 7497E57B AT connection DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: yerricde.laptop.rose-hulman.edu
X-Trace: solomon.cs.rose-hulman.edu 939579822 23784 137.112.205.146 (10 Oct 1999 18:23:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news AT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Oct 1999 18:23:42 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

sam <samirw AT connection DOT com> wrote:
> Is it still O.K. to use rhide for c++? I see that
> RHIDE has not changed in several years.
>8
> It calls LD with the -lstdcx and of course this
> causes 'lib not found' or similar message.

Here's what you do to fix the -lstdcx bug:

1. Look in Read Me Third.
http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~yerricde/minifaq.txt
2. If that doesn't help, look in section 8.7 of the
DJGPP FAQ list.
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/v2faq/

> I have just gone through the process of downloading all the files
> suggested by the picker but still no STDCX.a

It used to be called LIBSTDCX.A (to conform with old DOS
8.3 naming); now it's called libstdcxx.a (note the extra x). Some
versions of RHIDE were not updated to reflect the change.


Damian Yerrrick
http://come.to/yerrick