www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Felix Natter <f DOT natter AT ndh DOT net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: problems gcc2.95.1 with binutils 2.81 ? |
Date: | 10 Oct 1999 13:41:58 +0200 |
Organization: | Customer of NDH Netzwerkdienste Hoeger GmbH |
Message-ID: | <wkemf3v3w9.fsf@mail.ndh.net> |
References: | <wkhfk0lvtv DOT fsf AT mail DOT ndh DOT net> <Ik_L3.1824$_4 DOT 2912 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | port239.bonn.ndh.net |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | passat.ndh.net 939562917 13404 195.94.93.239 (10 Oct 1999 13:41:57 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT ndh DOT net |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 10 Oct 1999 13:41:57 GMT |
User-Agent: | Gnus/5.070084 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.84) Emacs/20.4 |
Lines: | 15 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
"Johan Venter" <jventer AT writeme DOT com> writes: > I use gcc 2.95 (not 2.95.1) with binutils 2.8.1 and I've had absolutely no > problems so far. What problems are you having? no, I am not having any problems either, I was just asking if one should better use the 2.9.1 binutils, because in the gcc-2.95(.1) readme it tells you that 2.9.1 is recommended. I just got mail from Eli Zaretski though, and he said there are no known issues with 2.8.1, ít would simply be nice to do some beta-testing onm 2.9.1 (if you want to). -- Felix Natter
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |