From: Felix Natter <f DOT natter AT ndh DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: problems gcc2.95.1 with binutils 2.81 ?
Date: 10 Oct 1999 13:41:58 +0200
Organization: Customer of NDH Netzwerkdienste Hoeger GmbH
Message-ID: <wkemf3v3w9.fsf@mail.ndh.net>
References: <wkhfk0lvtv DOT fsf AT mail DOT ndh DOT net> <Ik_L3.1824$_4 DOT 2912 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: port239.bonn.ndh.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: passat.ndh.net 939562917 13404 195.94.93.239 (10 Oct 1999 13:41:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT ndh DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Oct 1999 13:41:57 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070084 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.84) Emacs/20.4
Lines: 15
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


"Johan Venter" <jventer AT writeme DOT com> writes:
> I use gcc 2.95 (not 2.95.1) with binutils 2.8.1 and I've had absolutely no
> problems so far. What problems are you having?

no, I am not having any problems either, I was just asking
if one should better use the 2.9.1 binutils, because
in the gcc-2.95(.1) readme it tells you that 2.9.1 is
recommended.
I just got mail from Eli Zaretski though, and he said
there are no known issues with 2.8.1, ít would simply
be nice to do some beta-testing onm 2.9.1 (if you want to).

--
Felix Natter