www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-ID: | <374547CD.CEAAE0D3@go.ro> |
Date: | Fri, 21 May 1999 14:47:25 +0300 |
From: | Radu Georgescu aka skoola <skoola AT go DOT ro> |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) |
X-Accept-Language: | en |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: problem with extended inline asm |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990518135146 DOT 24330X-100000 AT is> <3743B4E7 DOT 12663C12 AT go DOT ro> <374730AF DOT 831BEA33 AT cartsys DOT com> |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
> if both a and b are automatic variables, you may also do this stuff but there > > should be -2+%0 instead 2+%0 ,IMHO > > NO. This may work now but you CANNOT depend on it. The compiler is at > liberty to place variables wherever it wants. There is absolutely > nothing requiring it to put variables declared together adjacent to each > other. ok, but what if you will group them in a struct?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |