Message-ID: <374547CD.CEAAE0D3@go.ro>
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 14:47:25 +0300
From: Radu Georgescu aka skoola <skoola AT go DOT ro>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: problem with extended inline asm
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990518135146 DOT 24330X-100000 AT is> <3743B4E7 DOT 12663C12 AT go DOT ro> <374730AF DOT 831BEA33 AT cartsys DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

 > if both a and b are automatic variables, you may also do this stuff but there

> > should be -2+%0 instead 2+%0 ,IMHO
>
> NO. This may work now but you CANNOT depend on it.  The compiler is at
> liberty to place variables wherever it wants.  There is absolutely
> nothing requiring it to put variables declared together adjacent to each
> other.

ok, but what if you will group them in a struct?