From:	"Rafael García" <rafael AT geninfor DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	performance
Date:	Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:07:09 +0100
Organization:	CTV/JET
Lines:	14
Message-ID:	<78sbrj$71p$1@lola.ctv.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	infon385.jet.es
X-Trace:	lola.ctv.es 917615283 7225 195.55.157.129 (29 Jan 1999 13:08:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT lola DOT ctv DOT es
NNTP-Posting-Date:	29 Jan 1999 13:08:03 GMT
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-Mimeole:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

I am testing gcc to work instead of Borland C 3.1 but programs are much
slower. For example, a sequential search in a file takes 18 seconds, whereas
same operation with BC ends in 2.3 sec.

In fact, I expected to achieve a better times than with BC because I need
huge memory model with BC and suppose this makes program slower.

I don't understand. Anybody can explain?

Thanks.

- Raw text -