From: "Rafael García" <rafael AT geninfor DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: performance
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:07:09 +0100
Organization: CTV/JET
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <78sbrj$71p$1@lola.ctv.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: infon385.jet.es
X-Trace: lola.ctv.es 917615283 7225 195.55.157.129 (29 Jan 1999 13:08:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT lola DOT ctv DOT es
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Jan 1999 13:08:03 GMT
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

I am testing gcc to work instead of Borland C 3.1 but programs are much
slower. For example, a sequential search in a file takes 18 seconds, whereas
same operation with BC ends in 2.3 sec.

In fact, I expected to achieve a better times than with BC because I need
huge memory model with BC and suppose this makes program slower.

I don't understand. Anybody can explain?

Thanks.