Date:	Mon, 16 Nov 1998 10:28:45 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Arthur <arfa AT clara DOT net>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	RE: size of a function in memory
In-Reply-To:	<199811152033.UAA07028@remus.clara.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.981116102827.7241I-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 15 Nov 1998, Arthur wrote:

> > > If the system breaks down with a new release of DJGPP, is there a more
> > > portable method of doing this?
> >
> > The only reliable method I know of is to rewrite the handlers in
> > assembly.  There *you* are the boss, not the compiler.
> 
> Unless you optimise using -O3, so I've heard :-)

I meant assembly, not inline assembly.  How can -O3 affect pure
assemby code?

- Raw text -