Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 10:28:45 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Arthur <arfa AT clara DOT net>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: RE: size of a function in memory
In-Reply-To: <199811152033.UAA07028@remus.clara.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.981116102827.7241I-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


On Sun, 15 Nov 1998, Arthur wrote:

> > > If the system breaks down with a new release of DJGPP, is there a more
> > > portable method of doing this?
> >
> > The only reliable method I know of is to rewrite the handlers in
> > assembly.  There *you* are the boss, not the compiler.
> 
> Unless you optimise using -O3, so I've heard :-)

I meant assembly, not inline assembly.  How can -O3 affect pure
assemby code?