From:	ranla AT post DOT tau DOT ac DOT il (Tal Lavi)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Can't inline routines from other moudles
Date:	Mon, 9 Nov 1998 12:20:17 LOCAL
Organization:	Tel-Aviv University Computation Center
Lines:	25
Message-ID:	<ranla.83.0008C20E@post.tau.ac.il>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 981108194129 DOT 14294D-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	slip-108.tau.ac.il
X-Newsreader:	Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4]
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

>On Sun, 8 Nov 1998, Tal Lavi wrote:

>> Actually, that makes sense, inlining is done in compile time, not in link 
>> time, right?

>Right.

>> Is there a way over this problem? Those routines are called very frequently, 
>> and not inlining them may cause a huge performance issue.

>``May cause'' or ``does cause''?  There's a big difference between these 
>two.  I suggest to profile the program before you go to extremes like 
>that.

>The way to inline library functions is to copy their definitions into 
>your source, or to write your own substitutes for them.  Is it really 
>worth this hassle?

Those functions are already written by me, they just located in another moudle.

>Which functions are those, btw?

Functions which returns the correct sin,cos & tan values from the LUT.

- Raw text -