From: ranla AT post DOT tau DOT ac DOT il (Tal Lavi) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Can't inline routines from other moudles Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 12:20:17 LOCAL Organization: Tel-Aviv University Computation Center Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: slip-108.tau.ac.il X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4] To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com >On Sun, 8 Nov 1998, Tal Lavi wrote: >> Actually, that makes sense, inlining is done in compile time, not in link >> time, right? >Right. >> Is there a way over this problem? Those routines are called very frequently, >> and not inlining them may cause a huge performance issue. >``May cause'' or ``does cause''? There's a big difference between these >two. I suggest to profile the program before you go to extremes like >that. >The way to inline library functions is to copy their definitions into >your source, or to write your own substitutes for them. Is it really >worth this hassle? Those functions are already written by me, they just located in another moudle. >Which functions are those, btw? Functions which returns the correct sin,cos & tan values from the LUT.