From:	mdruiter AT cs DOT vu DOT nl (Ruiter de M)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: PROBLEM WITH FUNCTION RAND()
Date:	11 May 1998 12:18:12 GMT
Organization:	Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, VU, Amsterdam
Lines:	18
Message-ID:	<6j6qa4$9lj$1@star.cs.vu.nl>
References:	<Pine DOT 3 DOT 89 DOT 9805111655 DOT A22061-0100000 AT octarine>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	galjas.cs.vu.nl
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Paul Wankadia (wanpsm98 AT octarine DOT cc DOT adfa DOT oz DOT au) wrote:
> On Sun, 10 May 1998, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> > >I tried that once and discovered that rawclock() always returns 0 (for 
> > In 2.01 it returns the number of clock ticks since first called, though the
> > docs imply differently. In 2.02 it will return ticks since midnight.
> 
> I could swear I downloaded v2.01 ... I guess I caught the mirror-site in 
> the midst of a refresh ...

If it returned 0 you probably have, haven't you? In 2.01 the number of
ticks since first called is returned, which is 0. 2.02 is just alpha
as we speak.

-- 
Groeten, Michel.        http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mdruiter
  ____________
  \  /====\  /          "You know, Beavis, you need things that suck,
   \/      \/           to have things that are cool", Butt-Head.

- Raw text -