From: mdruiter AT cs DOT vu DOT nl (Ruiter de M) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: PROBLEM WITH FUNCTION RAND() Date: 11 May 1998 12:18:12 GMT Organization: Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, VU, Amsterdam Lines: 18 Message-ID: <6j6qa4$9lj$1@star.cs.vu.nl> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: galjas.cs.vu.nl To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk Paul Wankadia (wanpsm98 AT octarine DOT cc DOT adfa DOT oz DOT au) wrote: > On Sun, 10 May 1998, Nate Eldredge wrote: > > >I tried that once and discovered that rawclock() always returns 0 (for > > In 2.01 it returns the number of clock ticks since first called, though the > > docs imply differently. In 2.02 it will return ticks since midnight. > > I could swear I downloaded v2.01 ... I guess I caught the mirror-site in > the midst of a refresh ... If it returned 0 you probably have, haven't you? In 2.01 the number of ticks since first called is returned, which is 0. 2.02 is just alpha as we speak. -- Groeten, Michel. http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mdruiter ____________ \ /====\ / "You know, Beavis, you need things that suck, \/ \/ to have things that are cool", Butt-Head.