From:	bgaffney42 AT aol DOT com (BGaffney42)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: djgpp 2.1?
Date:	2 Mar 1998 14:45:06 GMT
Lines:	8
Message-ID:	<19980302144501.JAA10659@ladder02.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ladder02.news.aol.com
Organization:	AOL http://www.aol.com
References:	<xnlnv71yvr DOT fsf AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

DJ wrote:

>In 2.10, DJGPP_MINOR will be set to 10.  DJGPP uses two-digit
>numbers, so 2.1 is an invalid version because of the ambiguity.
>The current rev is 2.01; nine revs from now would be 2.10.

Wouldn't that make the current rev 02.01? :-)

- Raw text -