From: bgaffney42 AT aol DOT com (BGaffney42)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: djgpp 2.1?
Date: 2 Mar 1998 14:45:06 GMT
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <19980302144501.JAA10659@ladder02.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder02.news.aol.com
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
References: <xnlnv71yvr DOT fsf AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

DJ wrote:

>In 2.10, DJGPP_MINOR will be set to 10.  DJGPP uses two-digit
>numbers, so 2.1 is an invalid version because of the ambiguity.
>The current rev is 2.01; nine revs from now would be 2.10.

Wouldn't that make the current rev 02.01? :-)