From:	kaz AT vision DOT crest DOT nt DOT com (Kaz Kylheku)
Newsgroups:	comp.text.tex,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DJGPP port of TeX (with instructions for non-DJGPP'ers) (Was Re: Win95 and LaTex ?)
Date:	8 Jul 1997 13:23:49 -0700
Organization:	Prism Systems Inc.
Lines:	17
Message-ID:	<5pu7kl$3dl$1@vision.crest.nt.com>
References:	<5p64rj$dsu$2 AT news DOT ccit DOT arizona DOT edu> <InhnyKW00iWm08YGM0 AT andrew DOT cmu DOT edu> <33C1AF28 DOT 7D16F020 AT a DOT crl DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	47.63.64.170
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <33C1AF28 DOT 7D16F020 AT a DOT crl DOT com>,
Weiqi Gao  <weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com> wrote:
>John H Steele wrote in comp.text.tex:
>
>>[emTeX, gTeX, MiKTeX availability and MiKTeX recommendation]
>
>The FAQ needs to be updated to add another DOS port of TeX --- the DJGPP
>v.2.01 done by Eli Zaretskii <mailto:eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>.  This is a
>solid TeX port, and, together with GhostScript/GSView, form a superior
>(La)TeX environment for DOS and Windows 95.  It has the same

Why do people do TeX/LaTeX with Windows 95? Or, more precisely, why would a
TeXpert bother with windows? You are one step away from not needing a GUI at
all if you can typeset with these tools, so it's not like you need to run
Word! :)

Strange.

- Raw text -