From: kaz AT vision DOT crest DOT nt DOT com (Kaz Kylheku)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DJGPP port of TeX (with instructions for non-DJGPP'ers) (Was Re: Win95 and LaTex ?)
Date: 8 Jul 1997 13:23:49 -0700
Organization: Prism Systems Inc.
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <5pu7kl$3dl$1@vision.crest.nt.com>
References: <5p64rj$dsu$2 AT news DOT ccit DOT arizona DOT edu> <InhnyKW00iWm08YGM0 AT andrew DOT cmu DOT edu> <33C1AF28 DOT 7D16F020 AT a DOT crl DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.63.64.170
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

In article <33C1AF28 DOT 7D16F020 AT a DOT crl DOT com>,
Weiqi Gao  <weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com> wrote:
>John H Steele wrote in comp.text.tex:
>
>>[emTeX, gTeX, MiKTeX availability and MiKTeX recommendation]
>
>The FAQ needs to be updated to add another DOS port of TeX --- the DJGPP
>v.2.01 done by Eli Zaretskii <mailto:eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>.  This is a
>solid TeX port, and, together with GhostScript/GSView, form a superior
>(La)TeX environment for DOS and Windows 95.  It has the same

Why do people do TeX/LaTeX with Windows 95? Or, more precisely, why would a
TeXpert bother with windows? You are one step away from not needing a GUI at
all if you can typeset with these tools, so it's not like you need to run
Word! :)

Strange.